
What a lender weighs besides the credit score
A credit score is one input among several. What a Canadian vehicle lender weighs besides the score, in roughly the order it matters, and why files differ.
What a consumer proposal does to a Canadian credit file while it is active and after completion, and which single document changes the conversation.

A consumer proposal is an arrangement made under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, administered by a Licensed Insolvency Trustee, in which creditors accept an agreed settlement of debts over a defined period. It is not bankruptcy, and it is treated differently on a credit file — but the difference is smaller than most people are led to expect.
Accounts included in a proposal are reported as included, and the proposal itself is recorded on the file. Both bureaus flag it.
For most lender programs, an active proposal is the harder state to lend against. The obligation is live, the payments are ongoing, and the arrangement has not yet demonstrated that it will be completed.
Many programs will still consider a file with an active proposal, more so where a good part of the term has been paid on schedule and income is well documented. It is a smaller field than after completion, and the terms available are generally not the same — but an active proposal is a reason to apply carefully, not a reason to wait.
When the terms are fulfilled, the trustee issues a Certificate of Full Performance. That document is the thing that changes the conversation, and it changes it more than people expect.
Practically:
Get the certificate, keep it somewhere you can find it, and send a copy with any application. This is the single most useful document a file in this situation can carry.
The two bureaus treat it slightly differently, which is a persistent source of confusion.
Equifax Canada generally removes a consumer proposal three years after the date of completion, or six years after the date it was filed, whichever comes first.
TransUnion Canada generally removes it three years after completion, with some provincial variation.
The individual accounts included in the proposal follow their own six-year clock from the date of last activity, which is why a file can show a completed proposal alongside included accounts that have not yet aged off. That is normal and it is not an error.
Not the proposal itself, particularly. The specific things:
A completed proposal with two years of clean history behind it is a file most programs can work with. That is a genuinely different statement from what most people in this situation have been told.
Say so in the application. It is on the report and it will be read; a file that states it plainly and attaches the certificate is straightforward to place, and a file where it surfaces at underwriting costs a round trip.
Both insolvency routes are covered on bad credit car loans, which has sections on bankruptcies and on consumer proposals — they are reported on different schedules and lenders read them differently.

A credit score is one input among several. What a Canadian vehicle lender weighs besides the score, in roughly the order it matters, and why files differ.

What a repossession or voluntary surrender puts on a Canadian credit file, how long it stays, and what a car financing lender weighs after it.

The discharge is the date that matters. What it changes on a Canadian credit file, and what car financing looks like after one, document by document.
It opens a file, not a phone tree. It goes to one dealer partner at a time, where a specialist reads it — never a list.
Programs may vary by province. Approval is subject to lender review and application details.